25 Free California Property & Casualty Exam Practice Questions (2026)
How to Use This California Question Set
The California Property and Casualty examination has 150 scored multiple-choice questions and 195 minutes to answer them, and 60% raw — 90 correct — is a pass. PSI may add 5 to 10 unscored experimental questions on top of the 150, and you will not be told which ones they are. The exam draws 75 questions from the CDI's Property License Examination Objectives and 75 from the Casualty objectives, both effective January 1, 2026. Unlike California's Life and Accident & Health exam, the Property and Casualty LEOs publish weights at the section level only — no per-topic question counts — so a sample has to follow those section percentages: General Insurance 15% of each half, Property Insurance 15%, Personal Lines Property 38% (the single biggest block on either half), Commercial Property and Pet Insurance 30% plus 2%, Casualty Insurance 15%, Personal Lines Casualty 35%, and Commercial Casualty 35%. California law — cancellation and nonrenewal, the Unfair Practices Act, the FAIR Plan, CAARP, workers' compensation statutes and producer ethics — is not a separate section on either objectives document; it is woven through Personal Lines and Commercial Insurance throughout, which is why the LanePrep course gathers it into its own chapter.
These 25 questions come from LanePrep's California Property & Casualty quiz bank and are sampled in roughly that proportion across all eight tested course chapters: general insurance and contract law, then property basics, personal lines property, commercial property and pet insurance, casualty basics, personal lines casualty, commercial casualty, and California law. Each question shows its chapter, so a miss tells you which chapter to go back to.
The set is not a predictor on its own. Twenty-five questions cannot cover every objective on a 150-question exam split across two license lines. What it does show is whether the general property and casualty material has stuck and whether the California-specific rules — the FAIR Plan's statutory perils, CAARP eligibility, the producer's fiduciary duty over premiums, the state's own cancellation notice requirements — are in place.
Work them before you read the answer. Every question has the explanation folded underneath it. Guessing and then reading is worth more than reading and then agreeing.
Practice Questions 1-10: General Insurance, Property Basics and Personal Lines Property
General Insurance covers the elements of a valid contract, the producer's fiduciary duty over premiums, and the agent/broker distinction — tested on both halves of the exam. Property Insurance basics bring in California-specific statutes on rebuilding after a declared emergency and the residential disclosure statement. Personal Lines Property, the biggest single block on either objectives document, is sampled here through homeowners forms, the efficient proximate cause doctrine and the California Earthquake Authority.
Question 1 (Chapter 1)
An individual decides to open a high-stakes illegal gambling den in their basement and seeks to purchase a commercial liability policy to cover potential losses from police raids. Why would an insurer refuse this based on the elements of a contract?
- A) The contract lacks competent parties.
- B) The contract lacks a legal purpose.
- C) The contract lacks consideration from the insurer.
- D) The contract is aleatory in nature.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
To be a valid contract, the agreement must have a legal purpose. Insuring an illegal activity (gambling den) violates public policy and the legal purpose requirement. Aleatory refers to the unequal exchange of value, which is a standard characteristic of insurance, not a reason for refusal.
Question 2 (Chapter 1)
A licensed insurance producer in California receives a premium payment from an insured and deposits it into their personal checking account before forwarding it to the insurer. Which provision of the Insurance Code is violated?
- A) Section 1729.2, regarding reporting administrative actions.
- B) Section 1733, regarding fiduciary duty of producers.
- C) Section 1726(a), regarding internet advertisements.
- D) Section 1708, regarding license surrender.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Insurance Code §1733 establishes the fiduciary duty of producers to handle premiums and funds entrusted to them. Depositing premiums into a personal account violates this duty by commingling funds. Option A is incorrect because §1729.2 requires reporting of administrative actions, not premium handling. Option C is incorrect because §1726(a) governs internet advertisements. Option D is incorrect because §1708 concerns license surrender procedures.
Question 3 (Chapter 1)
Which statement correctly describes the difference between an agent and a broker under the California Insurance Code?
- A) An agent represents the insurer, while a broker represents the insured.
- B) A broker can bind coverage without the insurer's consent, while an agent cannot.
- C) An agent must hold a surplus lines license to place business with non-admitted insurers, while a broker does not.
- D) A broker is paid by the insurer, while an agent is paid by the insured.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Under Insurance Code §31, an agent represents the insurer, and under §33, a broker represents the insured. This is the fundamental distinction in their roles and loyalties. Option B is incorrect because neither agents nor brokers can bind coverage without insurer authority; binding authority is granted by the insurer. Option C is incorrect because both agents and brokers need a surplus lines license (§§47, 1765) to place business with non-admitted insurers. Option D is incorrect because agents are typically paid by the insurer (via commission), while brokers may be paid by the insured (via fee) or insurer, but the payment structure does not define the role.
Question 4 (Chapter 1)
A licensed insurance producer in California is discussing a client's personal auto policy. The producer states, 'This policy provides broad coverage for any damage to your vehicle, regardless of fault.' Which of the following best describes the legal and ethical implications of this statement under California law?
- A) The statement violates the Unfair Practices Act because it is a false, misleading, or deceptive act or misrepresentation regarding the benefits or coverage of a policy.
- B) The statement is permissible as a general description of collision coverage, which is standard in personal auto policies.
- C) The statement is acceptable because producers are allowed to use persuasive language as long as the policy actually provides the coverage described.
- D) The statement is only problematic if the client relies on it and suffers a loss; otherwise, it is considered puffery and not actionable.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Under California Insurance Code §790.03(a)(5), representing that a policy includes benefits or coverage that it does not actually have is an unfair and deceptive act. Personal auto policies do not provide 'broad coverage for any damage regardless of fault'; they include specific coverages like collision and comprehensive, each with limitations. Option B is incorrect because the statement overstates the coverage. Option C is false; producers cannot make false statements even if persuasive language is allowed. Option D is incorrect because the Unfair Practices Act prohibits the act itself, not just harmful reliance.
Question 5 (Chapter 2)
An insured purchases a dwelling policy with replacement cost coverage on the dwelling. After a total loss from a wildfire declared a state of emergency, the insured elects to rebuild at a different location. Which statement is correct regarding the insurer's obligation under California Insurance Code §2051.5?
- A) The insurer must pay the full replacement cost of the dwelling at the new location, regardless of land value.
- B) The insurer is only obligated to pay the actual cash value of the dwelling at the original location.
- C) The insurer may deduct the land value at the new location from the replacement cost payment.
- D) The insurer must pay the replacement cost of the dwelling at the original location only; rebuilding elsewhere voids coverage.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Under §2051.5(c)(2), when rebuilding elsewhere during a state of emergency, the effect of land value must be considered; the insurer may deduct the land value at the new location. Option A is incorrect because land value is deductible. Option B is incorrect because replacement cost coverage applies, not actual cash value. Option D is incorrect because rebuilding elsewhere is permitted under §2051.5.
Question 6 (Chapter 2)
Under the California Residential Property Insurance Disclosure Statement requirements (§§10101-10102), which of the following is true regarding the disclosure form?
- A) The disclosure form must be provided to the insured at the time of policy issuance and renewal.
- B) The disclosure form is considered part of the insurance policy and overrides conflicting policy language.
- C) The disclosure form includes the exact replacement cost of the dwelling as determined by the insurer.
- D) The disclosure form is only required for commercial property policies.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The disclosure form must be provided at issuance and renewal per §§10101-10102. Option B is incorrect because the form is explicitly stated to be a general description and NOT part of the policy. Option C is incorrect because it does not include the exact replacement cost. Option D is incorrect because it applies to residential property.
Question 7 (Chapter 3)
A homeowner owns a duplex and lives in one unit while renting out the other. Both units become uninhabitable for two months due to a covered fire. The homeowner's HO-3 policy covers their primary residence. They also have a Dwelling Policy (DP-2 Broad Form) for the rental unit. Which of the following statements correctly describes how lost income and additional expenses would be covered?
- A) The HO-3 policy would cover the lost rental income from the tenant's unit, and the DP-2 would cover the homeowner's additional living expenses.
- B) The HO-3 policy would cover the homeowner's additional living expenses, and the DP-2 policy would cover the lost rental income from the tenant's unit.
- C) Both policies would cover additional living expenses for the homeowner, but neither would cover lost rental income.
- D) Neither policy would cover lost income or additional living expenses, as these are indirect losses.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: B
Homeowners policies (like HO-3) include Coverage D (Loss of Use), which provides for Additional Living Expenses (ALE) incurred by the insured when their dwelling becomes uninhabitable due to a covered loss. Dwelling policies, particularly DP-2 and DP-3, include Fair Rental Value (FRV) coverage, which compensates landlords for lost rental income when a rental unit becomes uninhabitable due to a covered peril. Therefore, the HO-3 would cover the homeowner's ALE, and the DP-2 would cover the lost rental income from the tenant's unit. Option A is incorrect because HO-3 covers ALE for the owner, not lost rent from a separate rental unit. Option C is incorrect because DP-2 covers lost rent, not ALE for the owner. Option D is incorrect as both policies provide coverage for these indirect losses.
Question 8 (Chapter 3)
A homeowner is comparing an HO-3 Special Form policy with an HO-5 Comprehensive Form policy for their primary residence. They are particularly concerned about ensuring the broadest possible coverage for their valuable personal belongings, including jewelry, artwork, and electronics. Which of the following statements accurately describes the primary difference in personal property coverage between these two forms?
- A) The HO-3 covers personal property only for named perils, while the HO-5 provides open-peril coverage for personal property.
- B) Both HO-3 and HO-5 provide open-peril coverage for personal property, but HO-5 has higher sub-limits for certain categories of items.
- C) The HO-3 covers personal property at replacement cost, whereas the HO-5 covers it at actual cash value unless endorsed.
- D) Neither HO-3 nor HO-5 covers personal property for theft unless a specific endorsement is added.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
The HO-3 Special Form provides open-peril coverage for the dwelling but only named-peril coverage for personal property (similar to the HO-2 Broad Form list). In contrast, the HO-5 Comprehensive Form provides open-peril coverage for both the dwelling and personal property, meaning personal property is covered for all perils unless specifically excluded. Option B is incorrect because HO-3 does not offer open-peril coverage for personal property. Option C is incorrect as both forms typically cover personal property at Actual Cash Value unless a Personal Property Replacement Cost endorsement is added. Option D is incorrect as theft is a named peril covered under both HO-3 and HO-5 for personal property.
Question 9 (Chapter 3)
A homeowner has an HO-3 policy and experiences a loss when a tree falls on the roof during a windstorm, damaging the dwelling and breaking a window. Rain enters through the broken window and damages the interior. Under the efficient proximate cause doctrine, how is this loss treated?
- A) Only the roof and window damage is covered; interior water damage is excluded due to the rain.
- B) The loss is not covered because water damage is excluded, and the rain is considered a new and independent cause.
- C) The insurer pays for the roof and window but can subrogate against the tree owner for the interior damage.
- D) The entire loss is covered because windstorm, a covered peril under the HO-3, is the efficient proximate cause.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Under the efficient proximate cause doctrine, if a covered peril (windstorm) sets in motion a chain of events leading to the loss, and it is the predominant cause, the entire loss is covered. Here, the windstorm caused the tree to fall, which broke the window, allowing rain to enter. The windstorm is the efficient proximate cause, so the interior water damage is covered as an ensuing loss. Option A incorrectly excludes the ensuing damage. Option B incorrectly treats rain as a new cause. Option C introduces subrogation, which is irrelevant to the coverage determination under efficient proximate cause.
Question 10 (Chapter 3)
A California homeowner is interested in purchasing earthquake coverage through the California Earthquake Authority (CEA). They are comparing different policy options and learn about 'reduced-coverage policies.' Which of the following best describes a characteristic of CEA's reduced-coverage policies?
- A) Reduced-coverage policies offer lower deductibles in exchange for higher premiums.
- B) Reduced-coverage policies provide coverage only for the dwelling, excluding personal property and additional living expenses.
- C) Reduced-coverage policies are designed for older homes that do not meet current seismic building codes.
- D) Reduced-coverage policies offer lower limits for dwelling, personal property, and additional living expenses, making them more affordable.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
CEA's reduced-coverage policies are designed to offer more affordable earthquake insurance by providing lower limits for dwelling, personal property, and additional living expenses compared to standard CEA policies. They are an option for homeowners seeking some level of protection at a lower premium. Option A is incorrect; reduced coverage typically means higher deductibles or lower limits, not lower deductibles. Option B is incorrect; reduced coverage usually means lower limits across multiple coverages, not a complete exclusion of personal property and additional living expenses. Option C is incorrect; eligibility is not tied to building code compliance in this manner for reduced-coverage policies specifically.
Get the 25-question sample set by email
Want a full-exam practice set to study offline? Drop your email — we'll send 25 questions across every content area, each with the answer and explanation.
No spam. Just the questions and one optional follow-up.
Practice Questions 11-19: Commercial Property, Pet Insurance, Casualty Basics and Personal Auto
Commercial Property and Pet Insurance together make up 32% of the Property exam, tested here through the BPP form's earth movement exclusion, a coinsurance calculation and the pet insurance disclosure statute. Casualty Insurance basics bring in the WCIRB and the combined ratio. Personal Lines Casualty, 35% of the Casualty exam, covers personal auto and umbrella liability — both with the kind of arithmetic the exam favors.
Question 11 (Chapter 4)
A restaurant owner in San Francisco purchases a Commercial Package Policy (CPP) that includes the Building and Personal Property (BPP) coverage form with the special causes of loss form. After a landslide damages the building's foundation, the insurer denies the claim. Which statement best explains the denial?
- A) Landslide damage is only covered under the Broad form, not the Special form.
- B) The BPP form does not cover foundations, only the superstructure of the building.
- C) The restaurant owner failed to maintain the building, voiding coverage for earth movement.
- D) The special causes of loss form excludes all earth movement, including landslides, unless specifically endorsed.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The special causes of loss form excludes earth movement (which includes landslides, mine subsidence, and volcanic earth tremors) as a standard exclusion. This exclusion can be waived by endorsement for an additional premium, but absent such endorsement, landslide damage is not covered. Option A is incorrect because the Broad form also excludes earth movement. Option B is incorrect because the BPP form covers the building structure, including its foundation. Option C introduces a maintenance requirement not found in the BPP form or causes of loss forms.
Question 12 (Chapter 4)
A business has a Building and Personal Property (BPP) policy with a limit of $1,000,000 and an 80% coinsurance clause. The building's actual cash value at the time of loss is $1,500,000. A fire causes $200,000 in damage. What amount will the insurer pay for the loss?
- A) $166,667
- B) $200,000
- C) $150,000
- D) $120,000
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
First, calculate the required insurance: $1,500,000 × 80% = $1,200,000. The insured only has $1,000,000, which is less than required. The payment is calculated as (Amount of Insurance / Amount Required) × Loss = ($1,000,000 / $1,200,000) × $200,000 = (5/6) × $200,000 = $166,667. Option B ignores coinsurance. Option C incorrectly uses 75% (possibly confusing with value reporting form). Option D uses an incorrect ratio (e.g., $1,000,000/$1,500,000 = 2/3, then 2/3 × $200,000 ≈ $133,333, not $120,000).
Question 13 (Chapter 4)
Under a pet insurance policy in California, which of the following must be disclosed in writing at issuance in at least 12-point boldface type according to Cal. Ins. Code §12880.2(f)?
- A) The pet's breed and age
- B) The veterinarian's license number and clinic address
- C) The annual premium and deductible amount only
- D) The Department's mailing address, toll-free number, and website; the insurer's/agent's customer-service contact; a statement to contact the Department only after the insurer has failed to resolve the problem; and advice to contact the broker/agent for assistance if one issued the policy
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Cal. Ins. Code §12880.2(f) requires the consolidated 'Insurer Disclosure of Important Policy Provisions' document to be posted online and delivered in at least 12-point type at issuance. Additionally, written disclosure at issuance in 12-point boldface type must include: the Department's mailing address, toll-free number (§12921.1) and website; the insurer's/agent's customer-service contact; a statement to contact the Department only after the insurer has failed to resolve the problem; and advice to contact the broker/agent for assistance if one issued the policy. Options A, B, and C are not required disclosures under this section.
Question 14 (Chapter 5)
Under California Insurance Code §11750.3, which organization is designated as the advisory organization for workers' compensation in California?
- A) California Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB)
- B) National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI)
- C) Insurance Services Office (ISO)
- D) Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of America (WCIRBA)
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
California Insurance Code §11750.3 specifically designates the California Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau (WCIRB) as the advisory organization for workers' compensation in the state. The NCCI serves most other states but not California. ISO is involved in general property and casualty forms and data, not workers' comp rating. WCIRBA is not a recognized entity.
Question 15 (Chapter 5)
An insurer calculates its loss ratio as 65% and its expense ratio as 30%. What is the insurer's combined ratio?
- A) 35%
- B) 65%
- C) 115%
- D) 95%
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio (incurred losses divided by earned premiums) and the expense ratio (underwriting expenses divided by earned premiums). Here, 65% + 30% = 95%. A combined ratio below 100% indicates underwriting profit before investment income. Option A is the underwriting profit margin (100% - 95%). Option B is just the loss ratio. Option C incorrectly adds the ratios to exceed 100% without basis.
Question 16 (Chapter 6)
A California resident purchases a new car on Monday. Their current personal auto policy includes collision coverage on one listed vehicle. According to the ISO Personal Auto Policy provisions adopted in California, when does collision coverage automatically apply to the newly acquired vehicle?
- A) On the day of ownership, provided the insured carries collision on at least one other vehicle.
- B) Immediately upon taking ownership, with no notice required to the insurer.
- C) Only after the insured notifies the insurer within 14 days of acquisition.
- D) After 30 days, unless the insured pays an additional premium for immediate coverage.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
Under the ISO PAP, if the insured carries collision coverage on at least one vehicle shown in the declarations, collision coverage automatically extends to a newly acquired private passenger auto on the date the insured becomes the owner. No notice is required for the coverage to begin, though notice must be given within 14 days to continue coverage beyond that period. If no collision is carried on any vehicle, collision must be requested. Option B is incorrect because automatic application depends on having collision on another vehicle. Option C describes the notice requirement for continuing coverage, not when it starts. Option D is not based on ISO PAP rules.
Question 17 (Chapter 6)
A California driver carries the state minimum split limits of 30/60/15. They are at fault in an accident that injures three people, with damages of $40,000, $35,000 and $10,000 respectively. How much will their bodily injury liability coverage pay in total?
- A) $85,000 (sum of all injuries)
- B) $90,000 (three times the per-person limit)
- C) $70,000 (each claim capped at the per-person limit)
- D) $60,000 (the per-accident limit)
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
With split limits of 30/60/15, bodily injury coverage is $30,000 per person and $60,000 per accident. The first two claimants ($40,000 and $35,000) are each capped at $30,000; the third ($10,000) is within the limit. That would be $70,000, but the per-accident limit caps the total at $60,000. The remaining $25,000 is the driver's own liability. These are the minimum limits under Vehicle Code §16056 since January 1, 2025; the lower limits that applied before 2025 no longer exist.
Question 18 (Chapter 6)
What is the key difference between an umbrella liability policy and an excess liability policy in California personal lines insurance?
- A) An umbrella policy provides broader coverage than the underlying policies, while an excess policy only increases limits on the same coverage.
- B) An excess policy requires a self-insured retention, while an umbrella policy does not.
- C) An umbrella policy is only available for commercial risks, while an excess policy is for personal lines.
- D) There is no difference; the terms are used interchangeably in California.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: A
An umbrella liability policy not only provides higher limits (excess) but also often broadens coverage by filling gaps in the underlying policies (e.g., covering certain claims not covered by the underlying policies, subject to a self-insured retention). An excess liability policy solely provides additional limits above the underlying policies, following the same terms and conditions. Option B is incorrect because both umbrella and excess policies may use a self-insured retention (SIR), though it is more characteristic of excess; however, the defining difference is the breadth of coverage. Option C is wrong because both are available in personal lines. Option D is false; the terms are not interchangeable.
Question 19 (Chapter 6)
A California driver has an underlying auto policy with $50,000 bodily injury liability limit and purchases a $1 million umbrella policy with a $250 self-insured retention (SIR). If a covered loss occurs that is not covered by the underlying auto policy but is covered by the umbrella, how much will the umbrella policy pay for a $10,000 loss?
- A) $10,000
- B) $0
- C) $250
- D) $9,750
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
The umbrella policy has a $250 self-insured retention (SIR), which applies to losses not covered by the underlying policies but covered by the umbrella. For a $10,000 loss, the insured must first pay the $250 SIR. The umbrella then pays the remaining $9,750 ($10,000 - $250). Option A ignores the SIR. Option B incorrectly assumes no payment due to the SIR exceeding the loss. Option C only returns the SIR amount, which is incorrect—the insured pays the SIR, the insurer pays the excess.
Practice Questions 20-25: Commercial Casualty and California Law
Commercial Casualty is 35% of the Casualty exam — CGL, workers' compensation and employers' liability, tested here through the distinction between Coverage A and the exclusive remedy doctrine. California law closes the set: the FAIR Plan's statutory perils, the Unfair Practices Act's prohibition on misrepresenting coverage to a claimant, and SCIF's open-market role in workers' compensation.
Question 20 (Chapter 7)
A California restaurant owner has a Commercial General Liability policy with Coverage A (bodily injury and property damage liability) and Coverage B (personal and advertising injury liability). A patron slips on a wet floor near the bar, falls, and breaks their wrist. The patron sues the restaurant for medical expenses and pain and suffering. Which coverage applies to this claim?
- A) Coverage B only, as it involves personal injury from the patron's fall.
- B) Both Coverage A and Coverage B, as the fall caused bodily injury and the suit alleges personal injury.
- C) Neither coverage, as slips and falls are excluded under the CGL form.
- D) Coverage A only, as it involves bodily injury from a premises condition.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Coverage A applies to bodily injury and property damage liability arising from premises operations, which includes a patron slipping on a wet floor. Coverage B applies to personal and advertising injury (e.g., libel, slander, false arrest), not bodily injury from a slip and fall. The claim is solely for bodily injury, so only Coverage A responds. Slips and falls are not excluded under the standard CGL form.
Question 21 (Chapter 7)
A California employer has a workers' compensation policy. An employee suffers a work-related injury requiring hospitalization and 3 months of physical therapy. The employee receives medical benefits. Which statement is true regarding medical benefits under the California workers' compensation system?
- A) Medical benefits are subject to a 2-year time limit from the date of injury.
- B) Medical benefits are subject to a $10,000 dollar limit per injury.
- C) Medical benefits include all necessary medical care to cure or relieve the effects of the injury, with no time or dollar limits.
- D) Medical benefits exclude physical therapy unless authorized by the treating physician within 30 days of injury.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Under California workers' compensation law, medical benefits include all necessary medical treatment reasonably required to cure or relieve the effects of the work-related injury or illness. There are no time or dollar limits on these benefits. However, certain types of care, such as chiropractic and physical therapy, are subject to utilization review and may have visit limits if not deemed medically necessary, but the statutory framework imposes no blanket time or dollar caps. Option A is incorrect because there is no time limit. Option B is incorrect because there is no dollar limit. Option D is incorrect because physical therapy is not categorically excluded—it is covered when medically necessary, though subject to review.
Question 22 (Chapter 7)
A California employer's workers' compensation policy includes employers' liability coverage. An employee files a lawsuit alleging that the employer failed to provide safety training, knowing that the lack of training would likely cause injury when operating machinery. The employee is injured and sues for damages. Which statement is true regarding the employers' liability coverage?
- A) The claim is covered because employers' liability insurance covers all tort claims by employees for workplace injuries.
- B) The claim is not covered because employers' liability insurance excludes bodily injury arising from the employer's failure to provide a safe workplace.
- C) The claim is not covered because the injury is compensable under workers' compensation, triggering the exclusive remedy.
- D) The claim is covered only if the employee proves the employer acted with malicious intent.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
Employers' liability coverage under a workers' compensation policy protects the employer against certain tort claims by employees for workplace injuries that are not barred by the exclusive remedy doctrine. However, if the injury is compensable under workers' compensation (i.e., arises out of and in the course of employment), the exclusive remedy doctrine applies, and the employee cannot sue the employer in tort—even for alleged negligence like failure to provide safety training. Employers' liability coverage only applies in specific situations, such as third-party-over actions, dual-capacity suits, or consequential bodily injury to family members—not for direct employee injury claims that fall within workers' compensation. Option A is incorrect because employers' liability does not cover all tort claims. Option B is incorrect because there is no such exclusion for failure to provide a safe workplace. Option D is incorrect because intent is not required for employers' liability to apply in covered scenarios, but the claim is barred regardless.
Question 23 (Chapter 8)
A producer is explaining the FAIR Plan to a client who owns a brush-covered property in a high-risk wildfire area. The client asks what perils are covered under a basic FAIR Plan property insurance policy. Which of the following accurately describes the coverage?
- A) The FAIR Plan policy covers all perils except earthquake, flood, and landslide, making it equivalent to a standard HO-3 policy.
- B) The FAIR Plan policy covers fire and extended coverage, but excludes vandalism and malicious mischief unless specifically endorsed.
- C) The FAIR Plan policy covers the same perils as a Difference in Conditions (DIC) policy, including earthquake and flood.
- D) The FAIR Plan policy covers only fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm or hail, vehicles, and vandalism or malicious mischief.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Under California Insurance Code §10091(c), 'basic property insurance' provided by the FAIR Plan covers fire or lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm or hail, vehicles, and vandalism or malicious mischief. It does not cover earthquake, flood, or landslide, which are typically covered by a Difference in Conditions (DIC) policy. Option A is incorrect because the FAIR Plan is not equivalent to an all-peril HO-3 policy; it is limited to the specified perils. Option B is incorrect because vandalism and malicious mischief ARE included in basic coverage, not excluded. Option C is incorrect because the FAIR Plan and a DIC policy cover different perils; the DIC fills in what the FAIR Plan leaves out, such as earthquake and flood.
Question 24 (Chapter 8)
During a claim investigation, an adjuster falsely tells a claimant that their policy does not cover 'smoke damage' from a nearby wildfire, even though the policy explicitly includes smoke as a covered peril. Which California statute is the insurer violating?
- A) The California FAIR Plan Act (§10090).
- B) The Surplus Lines Disclosure Act (§1764.1).
- C) The Unfair Practices Act (§790.03) regarding unfair claims settlement practices.
- D) The Workers' Compensation Exclusive Remedy Doctrine.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: C
CIC §790.03(h)(1) prohibits 'Misrepresenting to claimants pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to any coverages at issue.' This is one of the 16 prohibited unfair claims practices.
Question 25 (Chapter 8)
A risk is placed with the California State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) for workers' compensation coverage. Which of the following statements is true regarding eligibility to place business with SCIF under California Insurance Code §11784?
- A) Only employers who have been declined by three or more admitted workers' compensation insurers are eligible to place business with SCIF.
- B) SCIF only accepts risks that are also placed with the FAIR Plan for property coverage.
- C) Employers must first obtain a certificate of self-insurance before being eligible to place business with SCIF.
- D) Any employer operating in California is eligible to place workers' compensation business with SCIF, regardless of their admission status with other carriers.
Show answer & explanation
Answer: D
Under California Insurance Code §11784, SCIF operates as a competitive workers' compensation carrier open to any employer in California, not only those already declined elsewhere; it also serves as a guaranteed market for employers who cannot find coverage in the voluntary market. There is no requirement for a specific number of prior declinations (Option A is incorrect), SCIF does not require concurrent FAIR Plan placement (Option B is incorrect; they are separate programs for different lines of business), and no certificate of self-insurance is needed to use SCIF (Option C is incorrect; self-insurance is an alternative to purchasing insurance, not a precondition for it).
The Mistakes That Cost Marks
Confusing agent and broker loyalty. Under Insurance Code §31 and §33, an agent represents the insurer and a broker represents the insured. Neither can bind coverage without the insurer's authority, and the payment method (commission vs. fee) does not define the role — the exam tests the representation, not the paycheck.
Treating a producer's premium-handling duty as optional. §1733 makes every producer a fiduciary over premiums collected. Depositing a client's premium into a personal account, even briefly and even with intent to forward it, is commingling — a license-discipline violation, not a bookkeeping shortcut.
Mixing up named-peril and open-peril forms. An HO-3 covers the dwelling on an open-peril basis but personal property only on named perils; the HO-5 extends open-peril coverage to both. A DP-3 is open-peril for the dwelling; a DP-2 is named-peril throughout. The exam swaps these constantly, so match the specific form letter to the specific coverage, not a general sense of 'the broader one.'
Stopping a coinsurance calculation at the loss amount. Coinsurance compares actual insurance carried to the insurance required (coinsurance percentage × value at the time of loss), then applies that ratio to the loss. Skipping the required-insurance step is the single most common arithmetic error on these questions.
Assuming the FAIR Plan covers everything a standard policy does. §10091(c) limits FAIR Plan basic property insurance to a specific list — fire, lightning, explosion, smoke, windstorm or hail, vehicles, and vandalism or malicious mischief. Earthquake and flood are not on that list; a Difference in Conditions policy fills the gap, it does not duplicate the FAIR Plan.
Forgetting that workers' compensation's exclusive remedy is the default, not the exception. An employee injured on the job generally cannot sue the employer in tort, even for alleged negligence like inadequate safety training. Employers' liability coverage responds only to the narrow exceptions — third-party-over actions, dual-capacity suits — not to ordinary workplace injury claims.
Citing the pre-licensing course as if it still applies. AB 943 removed California's 20-hour pre-licensing requirement effective January 1, 2026. The 12-hour ethics and Insurance Code course under §1749(a)(1) still has to happen, but before the license is issued, not before the exam.
Your Next Step
How did you score?
- 23 or more correct (92%+): You are comfortably above the 60% pass mark. Book the exam, then spend the remaining days on the two topic sets that go deeper than this sample: personal lines property, the single biggest block on the Property objectives, and California P&C law, where cancellation, the Unfair Practices Act, the FAIR Plan, CAARP and workers' compensation statutes all live.
- 15-22 correct (60-88%): You are in range but not comfortably so, and the CDI's own numbers say four in ten first-time combined candidates fail. Note the chapter of every question you missed and work those chapters first, then take the two topic sets above; they test the same material at closer range.
- Under 15 correct: You need the material, not more questions. Start with the study plan in how to pass the California Property & Casualty exam on your first try and work through the audio chapters before testing yourself again. The 2025 first-time pass rate was 57%, and repeat candidates passed at only 40% — there is no reason to expect a second attempt with the same preparation to go better.
Chapters 1 and 9 of the LanePrep California course are free at /ca/p-and-c/preview — full audio and the chapter quiz, no signup. For a full-length simulated run, try the practice exam.
Exam format, fees and pass rates come from the California Department of Insurance exam chart, the PSI Candidate Information Bulletin and the CDI Curriculum Board meeting packet. Read October 2026.
Free: 25 California P&C practice questions
Liked this article? Get 25 exam-style questions emailed to you — with full answer explanations, no credit card. Closest thing to studying offline.
No spam. Just the questions and one optional follow-up.
Study this topic with LanePrep
Listen to these audio chapters on your commute — no screen required.